Uh, why?
-
-
Replying to @chrisFnicholson @AustenAllred
And employee should make as much as their equally valued coworker regardless of where they live.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisFnicholson @AustenAllred
If "equally valued," it's commodity virtualizable job by def, so if Montana Mac wants as much as SF Sam, job actually goes to China Chen
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Basic econ: pool of interchangeable workers loses to the lowest bidder. Unique workers command their price working from anywhere.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr @AustenAllred
I get economics. I also get political and social realities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisFnicholson @AustenAllred
Those realities won't save wages getting depressed if interchangeably doable from Montana.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr @AustenAllred
Wages don’t get brought down to Montana standards they get normalized to “US market” standards across the board.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah that's why I said depressed, not brought down to Montana. Outsourced jobs tend to raise local average.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.