11/ About 150 years ago, if you wanted to drive societal change through institutions, you'd fund things like universities: "mission boxes"
-
-
24/ There is a tendency to believe that Internet can magically substitute for box-level functions in organic/emergent ways. True and false.
Show this thread -
25/ True part: Self-organizing systems can evolve the right structures to capture any kind of value a top-down designed "box" can
Show this thread -
26/ False part: they can do so at zero cost. When you unbox and rebox the research university, you don't have to create a new kind of box...
Show this thread -
27/ But your "emergent box" (for example, fora like arXiv) do need the equivalent of indirect cost support flowing towards them somehow
Show this thread -
28/ A broad way to understand this is that the Internet, as an institutional stack base-layer, lacks indirection/persistence dynamics
Show this thread -
29/ So while I'm all for de-institutionalizing the Industrial Age and its dinosaur institutions, I'm skeptical that it will be lossless
Show this thread -
30/ The Internet is not institutional magic-sauce. It can't create something out of nothing, or costlessly store/embody stuff.
Show this thread -
31/ The net needs financial plumbing to fuel network-mode reboxing that can persist value of no immediate value but that we'll regret losing
Show this thread -
32/ "Reboxing" is the wrong term actually. Unboxing is the right term for the destruction process, but the creation process deals in flows
Show this thread -
33/ We need flow metaphors for reboxing. Something like adding insulating layers to pipes or something. Not entirely sure where to take that
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.