Conversation

1/ I'd like to make up a theory of intelligence based on a 2-element ontology: boundary and interior intelligence
21
204
4/ A thesis I've been converging on is that boundary intelligence is VASTLY more consequential once interior intelligence exceeds a minimum
1
63
5/ Boundary intelligence is by defn meta, since you're tuning your filters and making choices about what to even let hit your attention
2
51
6/ I think it is highly consequential because almost all risk management happens via boundary intelligence (blindspots, black swans etc)
1
49
7/ Interior intelligence is your poker skill and strategy. Boundary intelligence is picking which table to sit down at
5
77
8/ Interior intelligence is reading a book competently, extracting insights and arguments. Boundary intelligence is picking books to read.
2
85
10/ Basically, better input plus mediocre IQ beats bad input and genius IQ every time, so boundary intelligence is leverage
2
114
11/ And obviously, boundary intelligence is more sensitive to context. The noisier and angrier info streams get, the more BI beats II
1
37
12/ Most of boundary intelligence has to do with input intelligence, but output intelligence becomes more important with higher agency
2
41
13/ Output intelligence is basically the metacognition around when/where/how/to-whom/why to say or do things you are capable of saying/doing
1
45
14/ We think a lot about external factors in decisions, but output intelligence is about freedom left after you've dealt with external part
3
41