but yeah, great software is a few original ideas combined with an enormous heap of "case law" aka bug fixes, UX tweaks, etc.
Conversation
My point is, only a fraction of seriously ambitious software can be pursued by individuals or small startup teams.
1
5
I'm enjoying reading through this thread. Off the cuff, I think I'd like to see a new career trajectory of mercenary->f-u money->missionary.
1
1
But I'm also thinking I need to try to grok the "poorly understood force" and gather my thoughts into probably a blog post.
2
One of my learnings post-gervais is that corporate "woke" types generally don't want to defer meaning till after fu$.
1
1
They want to get to minimum-viable $ and then optimize for meaning right after. The free agent crowd is fueled more by missionary exits.
1
2
Is the dynamic that they get snowed with "meaning theater" and then exit cynically to become mercenaries/free agents?
3
I touched on it in the premium mediocre post, but basically I think a lot of younger people are kinda leapfrogging to faux-leisure society
1
2
Reading the premium mediocre post now. You nailed it, BTW -- I needed no further definition before examples started popping into my head.
2
1
Ah. "Dressing for the lifestyle you're supposed to want." Cynics stay, because mission lets them maintain while waiting for stroke of luck?
2
1
That's one clue. I don't think I've figured out missionary culture yet.


