Asimov novels are 90% stilted expository dialogue punctuated by tepid action. Yet they somehow work. Why? I think sheer conceptual ambition.
-
-
The Brin one is good. The earlier two sorta (?) set it up though. Read once, never again
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Third one has Pebble in the Sky references galore. Explains the psychohistory need for The Sack. too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And it's a Benny Hill chase from about 1/3 of the way in
-
Yeah agreed on that. It was one of the first I read. Luckily teen me had poor taste so I continued reading hm anyway.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Brin effectively redefines the First v. Second v. Galaxa discussion
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The trilogy is definitely Brian Herbert-level stuff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.