Asimov novels are 90% stilted expository dialogue punctuated by tepid action. Yet they somehow work. Why? I think sheer conceptual ambition.
-
-
The Landon Devers/oligarch confrontation alluded to at the conclusion of one, turned into, "so the oligarchs imprisoned him and he died"
-
And "don't be an idealistic fool like Devers"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.