Asimov novels are 90% stilted expository dialogue punctuated by tepid action. Yet they somehow work. Why? I think sheer conceptual ambition.
Conversation
Replying to
They defined a genre. Similar to Doc Smith earlier. As space opera? It stinks. But it was the first fumblings towards greatness
1
1
Replying to
It doesn't stink! Psychohistory is still one of the finest operatic plot devices ever!
4
1
Replying to
I still wish Asimov stayed with the vignette approach from Foundation. It makes sense that The Plan failed over 1000 years... but still
2
Replying to
Hmm. I kinda liked how his style matured. The last-written books (Forward the Foundation and Robots and Empire) are my favorites.
Replying to
Interesting. I loved R&E growing up. It tied everything together. I hated it rereading it. It tied everything together.
2
1
Replying to
Not quite everything. He tried and failed to integrate the End of Eternity. Tying it all up vastly improved retreads of Empire novels.
1
Show replies
Replying to
That said, the monologue of Elijah Bailey, dying, remains one of my favorite bits, set my views on society/masses of people

