Conversation

Replying to
5/ It was not just an evolutionary cul de sac... it didn't even do much exciting twisting and branching on the way to a dead end
1
2
Replying to
6/ Tulip manias otoh are complex... there's a lot of excitement, and _apparently_ a story to tell, with events, players, developments, news
1
4
Replying to
7/ But like a ponzi scheme, when you dig, you find the root cause fundamentally underwhelming. You can't dig deep because there's no depth
1
5
Replying to
9/ If there are no complicated branchings and twists and turns to the story it's a pet rock. Test: it's a wikipedia 1-pager.
1
3
Replying to
11/ We're left with distinguishing tulip manias and the real deal. Here the test is equally simple: learning never gets seriously difficult
1
4
Replying to
13/ It is impossible to read just 1 tvtropes page. They're like chips. You'll invariably read 5-10 min, and the reading is NEVER difficult
1
4
Replying to
14/ Information/stories about tulip mania type things are like this: the going never gets hard, ever. You can endlessly explore fun trails
3
7
Replying to
16/ This is why I think blockchain stuff is the real deal, with a there there. I run into difficult terrain in every direction when I read.
4
20
Replying to
17/ Why does depth/difficulty matter? The presence of learning depth is necessary and sufficient for self-sustained generativity
1
9
Show replies