16/ Worse, most moral philosophy is obsessed with defining evil primarily to find targets for justifiable pain-causing.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
17/ Enemies give life meaning and purpose. Moralizing is overtly about trying to do good, but covertly about prepping victims for pain
6 replies 3 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @vgr
18/ The most common form is NIMBYism/tribalism. For many, the ingroup is _formed_ in order to create an outgroup it's ok to hate and hurt
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @vgr
19/ As a mostly-apathetic, I only came very reluctantly to this conclusion: that many actively enjoy causing/witnessing pain
2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @vgr
20/ It's an ugly theory of humans, but unfortunately very plausible evolutionarily. Finding pleasure in pain is adaptive in scarcity.
6 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @vgr
21/ Note that feeling others' pain (friends, kin, ingroup, random others) is not mutually exclusive with finding pleasure in pain
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @vgr
22/ You might be capable of both. But people *incapable* of finding pleasure in others' pain might be minority mutants.
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @vgr
23/ Which means the feel-good theory of civilization I opened with is a theory of, by, for freaks who can't find pleasure in others' pain
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @vgr
24/ Which brings us to the dark question: if finding pleasure in others' pain is central to psyche of "normal" humans, what is civilization?
4 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Look up "altruistic punishment" wanting to harm cheaters is very important to maintain beneficial social cooperation.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Addressed it somewhere around point 30
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.