Conversation

Replying to
33/ So we are talking causing/witnessing pain for pleasure, with moralizing and deterrence theories applied to justify/rationalize it
1
3
Replying to
34/ So why does this drive exist? There are four broad theories to consider: Disease/pathology, Darwinian, Jungian, and Buddhist.
1
5
Replying to
35/ Disease/pathology theory would treat desire to cause pain as a potentially fixable condition due to genetics/chemicals/lead for eg
1
6
Replying to
36/ Darwinian theory would take the other extreme, point to cats torturing mice, and say desire to cause pain is completely normal, adaptive
1
5
Replying to
37/ In between we have Jung, which would be some obscure thing about sadism being really about torturing your own shadow, a kind of growth
1
7
Replying to
38/ And finally, the Buddhist version, which is kinda similar to Jung in spirit. You'd say desire is the root of all pain
1
4
Replying to
40/ The Darwinian explanation is null hypothesis that I think explains the majority of cases. This is "normal" adaptive pleasure-from-pain
1
4
Replying to
41/ The Jungian explanation probably covers most of what we could consider consensual S&M relationships and many martial arts
1
5
Replying to
42/ And finally, Buddhist explanation I think only explains mutants who *don't* want to cause pain and uncomplicatedly seek to avoid it
1
6
Replying to
44/ But such exceptions aside, I think Buddhism is a pain philosophy for natural-borns who actually don't feel the desire pain asexuals
1
2
Replying to
45/ Part 1 of my tweetstorm could be called "The civilizational project of/for/by natural-born Buddhists is misguided."
1
2
Show replies