30/ If you treat desire to cause pain as a pathology and non-harm-causing, you will look for "deviant" conditions that cause this desire
Conversation
Replying to
31/ Let's set aside functional value of pain (learning to endure some pain yourself is maybe good; so causing mutual pain for that is too)
1
2
Replying to
32/ Let's also set aside societal-functional value if any, such as pain caused for deterrence purposes. These don't need pleasure to justify
1
3
Replying to
33/ So we are talking causing/witnessing pain for pleasure, with moralizing and deterrence theories applied to justify/rationalize it
1
3
Replying to
34/ So why does this drive exist? There are four broad theories to consider: Disease/pathology, Darwinian, Jungian, and Buddhist.
1
5
Replying to
35/ Disease/pathology theory would treat desire to cause pain as a potentially fixable condition due to genetics/chemicals/lead for eg
1
6
Replying to
36/ Darwinian theory would take the other extreme, point to cats torturing mice, and say desire to cause pain is completely normal, adaptive
1
5
Replying to
37/ In between we have Jung, which would be some obscure thing about sadism being really about torturing your own shadow, a kind of growth
1
7
Replying to
38/ And finally, the Buddhist version, which is kinda similar to Jung in spirit. You'd say desire is the root of all pain
1
4
Replying to
39/ My assessment: pathology theory is only true for tiny fraction of spectrum of pleasure-from-pain behaviors
1
3
Replying to
41/ The Jungian explanation probably covers most of what we could consider consensual S&M relationships and many martial arts
1
5
Replying to
42/ And finally, Buddhist explanation I think only explains mutants who *don't* want to cause pain and uncomplicatedly seek to avoid it
1
6
Show replies
