1/ Let's define civilization as as an aspirational state where there is no need to intentionally cause pain to others to get what you want
-
-
Replying to @vgr
2/ If "good" is defined as people generally on board with civilizing process (ie don't want to cause needless pain), what % of us are good?
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @vgr
3/ In answering this q we tend to replace moral absolutes of good/evil with shades of grey, to acknowledge complexity of trying to be good
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @vgr
4/ Ie we assume that most people *try* to be good in our sense, but complexity and moral ambiguities of world defeats them. Is this true?
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @vgr
5/ Alternate theory: being good is not as hard as we make it out to be, the grey areas aren't that grey.
3 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @vgr
6/ What if people AREN'T mostly good in the sense of not wanting to cause pain? What if causing pain in central to lives of many?
2 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @vgr
7/ I call this "shades of red" theory as opposed to shades of grey. To varying degrees a lot more people *want* to cause unnecessary pain
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @vgr
8/ Here is a picture I made of 'shades of red" theorypic.twitter.com/TUULhuBudK
2 replies 24 retweets 62 likes
9/ We are raised to believe only small % ("criminals") _want_ to cause pain for gain. Most don't. A few saints suffer for others (top left)
-
-
Replying to @vgr
10/ Shades of red theory asserts that majority - everybody to right of "apathetic" - gets off on others' unnecessary pain at least a little
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.