Traditional R&D (ie PhDs) is ass-backwards. You should race to your first original idea as fast as poss, *then* invest in discipline mastery
Conversation
Replying to
Spending years "paying your dues" and "learning the foundations" is bs propagated by R&D rent-seekers. Get to the frontier anyhow.
2
10
31
Replying to
The probability of novel ideas increases far more rapidly with knowledge than people assume. What n00bs lack is not knowledge but confidence
2
2
26
Replying to
You probably need only 3-6 mo from a discipline's traditional starting line to have an original idea, not 2-3 years as institutions pretend
3
4
32
Replying to
In fact if you wait too long to strike out on your own thought trails, the disciplines institutions might pwn your imagination, and kill it
1
3
22
Replying to
There is a pick-2-of-3 tradeoff among received knowledge, productivity, and imagination. Institutions want you to give up imagination
1
4
21
Replying to
I am eternally grateful to PhD advisor for valuing imagination and letting me sacrifice treadmill "productivity." Saved my sanity 18y ago 😄
2
1
7
Replying to
Only about 1/3 of academics have that altruism. About 2/3 basically knowingly kill student imaginations for greater immediate "production"
1
1
9
Replying to
The clueless students don't discover what's been done to them until years later, when they struggle with burnout. Cognitive factory farming.
Replying to
Wow so spot on... here's to hoping the inevitable correction in higher ed driven by insane tuition and zero cost online leads to better

