3/ This is really shitty for 2 reasons: first, most work is framed as a failure mode on some hierarchy of accomplishment
-
-
Replying to @vgr
4/ Second, and MUCH worse, work that's not on the "settling for less" sights-lowering gaze path isn't contemplated at all
1 reply 6 retweets 33 likes -
Replying to @vgr
5/ We end up in this bind because work is conflated with role, role with identity, identity with class status
1 reply 13 retweets 51 likes -
Replying to @vgr
6/ What if instead, education were framed around lowest possible *habits* with progressive raising of sights based on composing habit-sets?
2 replies 10 retweets 57 likes -
Replying to @vgr
7/ You would do forward state-space search in A=skill space rather than regression search backward from a goal-role in B=role space. A>>B
2 replies 4 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @vgr
8/ Instead of targeting a social class through work, you'd decouple that and traverse an individualized level-up hierarchy
3 replies 4 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @vgr
9/ This is more likely to diverge than converge. You'll get more unique.
1 reply 3 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @vgr
10/ Instead of convergent apples to apples competition for roles you'll need to compose teams that are even more unique than members
4 replies 4 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @vgr
11/ Interchangeability is for robots, humans can decouple social class+status from work identity. Their convergence is historical accident
2 replies 5 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @vgr
'Accident', not a feature of the bourgeois order? Will think on this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Accident of nature of industrial tech
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.