(a) i'm all for open borders (b) that and BI are indeed nigh impossible to phase in simultaneously (c) no more hypocritical than tax
-
-
Replying to @zem42
So long as we're clear on the fatal flaws in our favorite utopias. Bucky Fuller was for both btw. First big guy I've found with that stance
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
note that i just said impossible to phase in simultaneously. i believe a BI-first approach will generate enough surplus to afford OB next
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zem42
Neither is doable in the US imo... 310 million istoo big. Needs to be broken down into smaller politico-economic entities first.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Start with defacto OB for HNI, move down from there. Works for phones why not OB?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Apologies for not being clear. High Net worth Individuals
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_naveenmishra @vgr
ah - in which case, because HNIs tend to want to keep poorer people out. sceptical about program expanding downwards.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
True RE motive of HNI but if you want to bring about O.B. this could be one way of doing it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_naveenmishra @vgr
maybe OB for the rich + wealth tax of some sort
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's effectively what we're heading towards with mechanisms like Canada's investor visa drawing in Chinese real estate buyers etc
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.