I'm using them roughly as seeing novelty versus doing novelty
-
-
George Bush paintings are creative but not particularly imaginative. Most of Hollywood is also in that box.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
how is bush's work novel?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
well, it's more generically creative and requires the routine kind of novelty you need for any creation
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
yeah, unsure... why is that more creative that building a financial model
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
that one is easy, because it represents a narrative break. Always creativity in such breaks.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr @josephcohen and
Now if a painter built a financial model, *that* would be creative too. Context matters.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
ah so it being bush makes it creative? wouldn't that also be imaginative?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
for that he'd have to paint something other than dogs and veterans
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I consider the fact of Bush choosing to paint veterans of his own making to be kinda creative
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I suspect that irony is lost on him. He sincerely feels compassion, views his wars as forced on him
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.