I don't get this Sessions thing. The explanation that it was as part of his job seems reasonable. What am I missing? π€
Conversation
Replying to
That pertaining to his job is irrelevant given his precise statement under oath.
1
1
2
Replying to
Here's a comprehensive thread:
Quote Tweet
Welp. Sessions spoke to Russian ambassador twice during campaign despite saying no Russia contact at conf hearing. washingtonpost.com/world/national
5
Replying to
I think similarly to Flynn, it's bad because he didn't disclose it. And if it was routine, why conceal?
Replying to
There's the lying to COTUS part. Then there's the reason - no other committee member does that; no candidate team member should either.
Replying to
I mean, at the time, he was already a Trump booster, and the timing is terrible to be wearing multiple hats...
1
Replying to
That he lied under oath, obviously. Remember that time Clinton got impeached for lying about a bj? Yeah, this is def next level stuff.
1







