7/ Taking time off from work to go protest, especially for low-wage workers etc. is part of how "checks and balances are working" happens.
Conversation
Replying to
8/ There's costs to lawsuits. There's costs to civil servants taking principled stands and resisting executive orders.
1
1
2
Replying to
9/ Checks and balances are a) not free b) mostly paid for as 'insurance costs' in non-priced ways c) by people who can least afford to do so
1
2
7
Replying to
10/ And this is just micro-level issues with market-based narrative of 'everything is fine' there is the macro-level: fine compared to WHAT?
1
2
2
Replying to
11/ The counterfactual isn't just "no nuclear war, no concentration camps, haha you liberals were scaremongering"
2
1
2
Replying to
12/ Firstly, if somebody paid real but non-market costs to ensure doomsday didn't happen, your positive outcome isn't what you claim
1
1
2
Replying to
13/ Secondly, even if you leave out doomsday, right macro counterfactual is: how well *could* economy have done with a more normal POTUS?
3
1
5
Replying to
14/ Fair comparison would be a POTUS who might have done similar things but with less fascist craziness that has all non-white-males on edge
1
2
3
Replying to
15/ ie POTUS who pursues protectionism, ACA repeal, NATO unwind etc., but *without* threatening judges, tweet-destablizing war zones etc
1
1
3
Replying to
16/ Counterfactual diff gets at the costs of keeping fascists in check... how much economic value was lost in neutralizing the loony bits?
2
1
1
Replying to
18/ The market *still* hasn't priced in the history of black slavery into the US economic narrative for instance, and probably never will
2
2
4
Replying to
19/ Slavery reparations are (imo) unrealistic/idealistic, but that doesn't mean people aren't still paying for that market-unpriced history
2
1
3
Show replies
Replying to
not adding to the analysis & not yet directly affected, but my productivity has taken a hit due to immgrtion, travel, econ uncertainty
1
3

