Conversation

Replying to
3/ There are two main problems with the "market likes trump --> all is good" story: externalities and insurance costs.
3
4
Replying to
4/ Externalities: what *doesn't* the market price well within its time horizons? For example lost economic value of future grad students
1
3
Replying to
5/ (And here I don't mean just Muslim countries: reputatational damage means the US loses cream of talent from everywhere)
1
6
Replying to
6/ Insurance costs: "things are fine" doesn't happen by magic.Checks and balances work because some pay disproportionately to ensure they do
1
6
Replying to
7/ Taking time off from work to go protest, especially for low-wage workers etc. is part of how "checks and balances are working" happens.
1
6
Replying to
8/ There's costs to lawsuits. There's costs to civil servants taking principled stands and resisting executive orders.
1
2
Replying to
9/ Checks and balances are a) not free b) mostly paid for as 'insurance costs' in non-priced ways c) by people who can least afford to do so
1
7
Replying to
10/ And this is just micro-level issues with market-based narrative of 'everything is fine' there is the macro-level: fine compared to WHAT?
1
2
Replying to
11/ The counterfactual isn't just "no nuclear war, no concentration camps, haha you liberals were scaremongering"
2
2
Replying to
12/ Firstly, if somebody paid real but non-market costs to ensure doomsday didn't happen, your positive outcome isn't what you claim
1
2
Replying to
14/ Fair comparison would be a POTUS who might have done similar things but with less fascist craziness that has all non-white-males on edge
1
3
Replying to
15/ ie POTUS who pursues protectionism, ACA repeal, NATO unwind etc., but *without* threatening judges, tweet-destablizing war zones etc
1
3
Show replies
Show replies