the thing I like most about this tweet is that it isn't clear whether you are talking about trump or zuck.
Conversation
the obvious conclusion being that both benefitted from the same circumstances. Simple willingness and a people who craved it.
1
we can all sit here and pretend that winners and losers aren't determined by same odd fancies of mischievous chance as always
1
in the same way we created god from our incapability , or rather unwillingness, to understand nonexistence. 1/2
1
so too do we need to create reasons for the randomness which dominates our world. Ask yourself. Is trump a genius?
1
Ive read all of kouska. Listen. The world as you know it doesn't exist.1/n
1
n Fate: that is, the predetermination of the future, exists via the actuality of existence being predetermined by history. 2/n
1
the intrinsic problem being that history is chance. Is odds. Is probability. Probability is history is existence. 3/n
2
done. There is no need for people unwilling to listen to psuedointellectualism here. I fully understand your unwillingness.
2
I'm saying if you want to tweet a series, don't clutter my feed... tweet at all, and then QT+cc people for comment


