What is the non-hagiographic case that he knew/acted better than peers in determining rise of his empire vs being in right place/time?
-
-
the thing I like most about this tweet is that it isn't clear whether you are talking about trump or zuck.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
the obvious conclusion being that both benefitted from the same circumstances. Simple willingness and a people who craved it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
we can all sit here and pretend that winners and losers aren't determined by same odd fancies of mischievous chance as always
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
in the same way we created god from our incapability , or rather unwillingness, to understand nonexistence. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
so too do we need to create reasons for the randomness which dominates our world. Ask yourself. Is trump a genius?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @endearingbrew @vgr
The perennial question http://csc.ucdavis.edu/~chaos/courses/ncaso/Readings/Lem_Odds_NY1978.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ive read all of kouska. Listen. The world as you know it doesn't exist.1/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
n Fate: that is, the predetermination of the future, exists via the actuality of existence being predetermined by history. 2/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the intrinsic problem being that history is chance. Is odds. Is probability. Probability is history is existence. 3/n
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
dude I tag me from your tweetstorm please
-
-
* untag
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
done. There is no need for people unwilling to listen to psuedointellectualism here. I fully understand your unwillingness.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.