"Good for business" and "bad for business" look VERY different depending on your current scale and cash position.
Conversation
Replying to
1/ I want to sketch out a difference between two kinds of 'good for business' environments that people usually don't appreciate
2
5
5
Replying to
2/ A central fact of free-market capitalism is that capital does not care HOW it gains a return, and has no natural "time horizon"
1
1
7
Show replies
think of it as safety for the broadest/most pluralist set of visibly performed ideologies/social identities
paradox of 'intolerance of intolerance'. Still 10x better than homogeneous small town where all but 'home' ideology are unsafe
2
Replying to
No it does not. The buy-in is a $20,000 subscription membership that's the biggest homogenizing filter there is
1
Replying to
You're trolling, but who do you suppose makes SF not-affordable? A homogeneous set profiteering of land ownership perhaps?
Replying to
Depends on which rich set you're talking about. Both sets exist in Bay Area: tech billionaires, property developer billionaires
Replying to
They have VERY different priorities for development of the region, as you would know if you were interested in actual conflict
Replying to
You're turning into a pure troll from whom it is not actually possible to learn much
1
Replying to
the whole POINT of the damn thread is that they are now diverging in ways that people are not recognizing. Figure it out.
