Conversation

Replying to
7/ The new component isn't so much new as a sort of neutralization of the new. Modern soft power is based on good information. So pollute it
1
8
Replying to
8/ So the geopolitics map being crafted primarily under Russian catalysis of what is already a *natural* dynamic is not that complicated...
1
1
Replying to
9/ Step 1: amplify natural tendency of information landscapes to pollute and undermine themselves via truth --> bullshit pathways
1
5
Replying to
11/ Step 3: Accumulate hard-power advantages and wait, hoping time is your friend as world goes backwards towards 18th century chessboard
1
4
Replying to
12/ This is why, ultimately, it's futile to argue about whether Trump's shadowy links with Putin or whether Russia influenced the election
1
2
Replying to
13/ So long as you analyze things in terms of the nation-state global order, you're fitting the Surkovian narrative and playing their game
1
6
Replying to
14/ Where 'they' is not Russia, but the entire allied network of actors around the world who want to regress to a classic nation-state order
1
3
Replying to
15/ This means the actual conflict is between those who want to unwind all evolution in the global political order since roughly 1975 and..
1
6
Replying to
16/ ...Those who want to double down on it and get through to the other side of a world order solidly centered in digital, soft technologies
2
6
Replying to
18/ "Election influence" thing is a sideshow not because undermining of liberal democratic institutions and process is not important but...
1
2
Replying to
19/ ...but because retro-nationalists don't want to undermine them back to Stone Age, only to pre-digital form where they serve hard power
1
3
Show replies