Conversation
Replying to
it's kind of like 4/20 or 9/11 in that any time you see it in nature or the world or retweet/fave count it's an instant joke
1
Replying to
she's mounting defense around a days-in-office countdown. Puzzle theory meets apophenia meets conf bias meets dogwhistle
2
3
Show replies
Occam's Razor in social truth is relative to priors about person, so doesn't help here
Show replies
Replying to
When certain numbers have a powerful resonance for your tribe and you know it, you can't not be aware of it and disambiguate
1
if I were tweeting a broken sequence, I'd expect '42' to be interpreted as HHG reference for example and wouldn't be surprised
This Tweet is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Replying to
it's like Heisenberg uncertainty. We can never know.
Replying to
IMO She did it knowing liberals would go berzerk and look foolish to her fans - perfect deniability but no accident



