Any project has 2 phases: up to start line, after start line. Pre-start is for 2 things: detecting impossibility, assessing risk. NOT truth.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
risk assessment shd include some check on which 'truths' can be trusted? Can involve a lot of work in stage 1
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tantele
I've found that there's nearly always synonymous with arguing yourself out of starting at all
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If a potential untruth doesn't prevent you from starting and going reasonably far, it should simply be accepted as a failure mode
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(ie the basic fail-fast philosophy: start-and-fail is better than pre-empt-failure-and-never-start because serendipity)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
most definitely IME it's a dance with the risk tolerance of the sponsors. Sponsors are often less tolerant than they think they are.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
yeah, we both learned that :D ... I'm now a big believer in fail-or-fait-accompli. Never give sponsors a chance to stop you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.