Any project has 2 phases: up to start line, after start line. Pre-start is for 2 things: detecting impossibility, assessing risk. NOT truth.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
Pre-start assumptions are just a +Δ on risk. Make an aggregate greenlight call based on your boldness, not presence of risks per se.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Pre-start impossibility testing isn't about arguing yourself out of a project. It's making sure you even have a line of attack.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Big reason to choose start-and-fail over pre-empt before start, *despite* sunk costs is that pre-start analysis has very low serendipity
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes
Two archetypes A: never start becoz they detect seemingly fatal flaw B: starts anyway, discovers serendipity that didn't show up in analysis
1:07 PM - 4 Dec 2016
0 replies
5 retweets
9 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.