1. Table of Contents. 2. Bibliography. 3. Flip to random point check out the prose.
-
-
-
Most telling: epigraphs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
e) edict from
@kissaneThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
love the weekend Review supp of WSJ. it doesn't matter whether the reviewer likes a book, but selection's great + reviews=useful precis
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
can't even vote cuz combo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Two important other factors: ·Expected to fill a knowledge gap I'm concerned about ·Canonical within its (often tiny) context
-
.
@polyparadigm canonicity is a contra-indicator for me in the social sciences/humanities, but a selector in the sciences/tech :D - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also recommendations by authors whose books I like.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Big qualifier: book friends are diff from friends in general.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if by friends you mean bibliographies of other books
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.