accurately interpreting reality requires assuming that: 1) real patterns exist ("neatness") 2) one's model is always too neat
-
-
-
What about other people and comparing notes?
@Meaningness@vgr
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To safely use postrationality you have to be post-truth. But we'll save that dangerous art for later.
-
∀*∈[a..z]:That doesn't sound particularly sa*e.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks! Retweeted
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Neatly wrapping up the discussion on rationality. Nothing wrong here.
@Meaningness -
I don’t like the term “postrational” because it sounds like it implies anti-rational.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Are you actually postrational? (serious)
-
no I'm not
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can't wait to understand what this means in 1–2 years
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.