that question does not compute for me at all. Feels like a category error.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
I bet many readers misunderstand that (e.g. in the FB thread, some argued your statements were meant to have truth value)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @juliagalef
I'm not saying they don't or that I set out lie or confuse or troll. Truth just isn't a special concern above others.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Right, but I think many readers would've predicted your answer to my truth value question would be "yes" not "category error"
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @juliagalef
I'm fine with that. Religious people tend to project so that can't be helped.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Well, one way it can be helped (if you want) is to simply tell people what you told me in this thread
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @juliagalef
I honestly don't think it makes a difference. If concern for truth is a strong attractor in cognition of a person...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr @juliagalef
...then refactoring will work poorly on them no matter what I say or what they understand of my motives.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
OK well, I'd say "I get it," but maybe in your model that means I don't get it and also that "models" are category errors :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @juliagalef
let's just say that in my exp, strong rationalists get little out of my writing at least. Other rf'ers may do better
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
they tend to like those of my posts I'm least happy with, and entirely miss point of the ones I feel work really well
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
