that question does not compute for me at all. Feels like a category error.
Conversation
Replying to
I bet many readers misunderstand that (e.g. in the FB thread, some argued your statements were meant to have truth value)
1
3
Replying to
I'm not saying they don't or that I set out lie or confuse or troll. Truth just isn't a special concern above others.
2
2
Replying to
Right, but I think many readers would've predicted your answer to my truth value question would be "yes" not "category error"
4
4
Replying to
I'm fine with that. Religious people tend to project so that can't be helped.
1
Replying to
Well, one way it can be helped (if you want) is to simply tell people what you told me in this thread
1
Replying to
I honestly don't think it makes a difference. If concern for truth is a strong attractor in cognition of a person...
1
...then refactoring will work poorly on them no matter what I say or what they understand of my motives.
1
Replying to
OK well, I'd say "I get it," but maybe in your model that means I don't get it and also that "models" are category errors :)
1
1
Replying to
let's just say that in my exp, strong rationalists get little out of my writing at least. Other rf'ers may do better
1
they tend to like those of my posts I'm least happy with, and entirely miss point of the ones I feel work really well


