Conversation

Replying to
A properly designed Twitter wouldn't have anyone sitting at HQ trying to figure out which accounts to ban and which ones to leave alone
2
26
Replying to
It would need to be personalized to each user, not a global list. One man's terrorist is another's revolutionary.
2
14
Replying to
I'm skeptical of 99.99% of 'free speech' derping. 0.001% is courageous speech under threat. Rest is "waah, she bit back" crybabies
1
1
Replying to
This is where we part ways. Introduce subjectivity in speech policing, and it's just another walled ghetto.
1
5
Replying to
there is always subjectivity; only diff is whether it's algo designer thinking of use cases or operations person thinking live cases
1
1
Replying to
Different model - you can reject global filters and let each user / group define and share their own. Web of trust solutions. They work
2
8
Replying to
then either your systems haven't been stressed past their abstraction leak thresholds or you're not acknowledging subjective elements
1
Replying to
One site had 10M uniques and the second has 4M profiles. You're just flat out wrong or we are talking past each other.
1
2