A properly designed Twitter wouldn't have anyone sitting at HQ trying to figure out which accounts to ban and which ones to leave alone
-
-
Replying to @naval
there we agree. PeopleRank or suchlike with sock puppet detection via machine learning for whack-a-mole trolls
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @vgr
It would need to be personalized to each user, not a global list. One man's terrorist is another's revolutionary.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @naval
I'm skeptical of 99.99% of 'free speech' derping. 0.001% is courageous speech under threat. Rest is "waah, she bit back" crybabies
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
This is where we part ways. Introduce subjectivity in speech policing, and it's just another walled ghetto.
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @naval
there is always subjectivity; only diff is whether it's algo designer thinking of use cases or operations person thinking live cases
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
Different model - you can reject global filters and let each user / group define and share their own. Web of trust solutions. They work
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
I've designed two in the past. It's how every well managed social network is run.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @naval
then either your systems haven't been stressed past their abstraction leak thresholds or you're not acknowledging subjective elements
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
One site had 10M uniques and the second has 4M profiles. You're just flat out wrong or we are talking past each other.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
You're claiming to have designed ideal systems with NO subjective elements introduced by designer. Yup, talking past each other.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.