7/ If we accept that some ppl in society must be "unoptimized" for others to be optimized, must we conclude that inequality is necessary?
-
-
Replying to @fortelabs
8/ Maybe this explains why as soon as you remove inequality from the system, the system collapses
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fortelabs
9/ Instead of striving for equity or even equality, maybe we should define the goal/boundaries/metrics of system to reward global optimiz.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fortelabs
10/ I guess there's the rub. Have to convince everyone a priori they'll be better off w/ global optimization
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fortelabs
11/ Hm, @ItIsmeLV says this could also be an argument for equity OVER equality https://goo.gl/images/H7zeDT
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @fortelabs
12/ Equality has an even playing field, benefiting the strongest, but improving the strong points doesn't improve overall throughput
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @fortelabs
13/ Equity has us focus on lifting up the weak points that are constraining overall throughput, exactly like TOC
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fortelabs
14/ This is also an argument for minimum basic income. I would work night and day on productivity regardless of how much it paid
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fortelabs
concepts of slack/equity collapse when you allow plurality of cost fns...what is slack in one flow context is bottleneck in other
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
I'm toying w/ D. Andersen's idea that knowledge work is about throughput of ideas, like a highly perishable good
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
not familiar with that... i think it's promising. I use a carbs/fats/proteins metaphor for knowledge myself
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.