Conversation

Replying to
Things like klout fail by being too legible, lack of auto-feedback into ux. I have to *decide* to ignore you because you're a klout loser
1
1
Replying to
Time as backend currency also helps subcultures differentiate. Mutual follow = less mutual time delay. Fully ignored 1 way = high delays
1
2
Replying to
With enough inbound, trolls end up auto-muted/blocked at back of oversubscribed queue that more trusted people keep jumping: infinite delay
2
6
Replying to
Now how do you *create* time here? If it is the backend currency, it must be minted right? Idea: make leisure economy literal!
1
2
Replying to
Some people have more time than money, some more money than time. Figure out who is who based on usage. Time-rich sell time to cash rich.
3
6
Replying to
Not sure how to operationalize this sufficiently illegibly (i.e. no paying/earning $ via "delay credits" instrument).
1
1
Replying to
But if this could be done you could make trickle-down literally true, and reimagine UBI as Gemeinschaft rather than Gesellschaft.
1
2
Replying to
There *may* be another dimension here: probability. You can not only delay an action, you can "drop" it, as with TCP/IP forcing retries
1
2
Replying to
They'd be good to apply, and since proof-of-work is basically a costly signal based on (wasted) time, it's a simpatico idea, but not core
1
Replying to
I think I just solved UBI and inequality in the process of reimagining Twitter, and without involving Black Mirror or In Time type dystopias
6