I've written up my 'too big to nail' theory of Twitter, but I think a pure economics view misses half the story http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=78cbbb7f2882629a5157fa593&id=d6081dc3f9 …
-
-
-
fun fact: one of my weird->normal funnel diagram.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
it's hard to run an ads business if you're targeting eggs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Fourth Estate never made much enduring profit either. (Defined narrowly, ignoring classifieds etc.)
-
bs... there were several decades of solid, lazy profitability. Plenty of data on that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
profits are patriarchal, it's 2016 my dude

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hmm...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you include the years from 2006-2010, I'm pretty sure banking has, in aggregate, not managed make a profit over its entire history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.