Let's say you're a history blogger who has written 10 essays on modern US history post-civil war, and 10 on post-Mao China...
Conversation
Replying to
This means the human truth-ground under your humanities/history writing is fundamentally shaky in a way books and more reading can't fix
2
6
Show replies
Replying to
To my knowledge that's an inaccurate, straw man-esque version of how academic history gets done. , care to comment?
1
I'm talking more about non-academic 'big' history of the sort that shapes politics.
1
Show replies

