What's the pascal's wager formulation for the simulation hypothesis?
-
-
Replying to @vgr1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @micahtredding @vgr
My (considerably more touchy-feely) take on the subject, in which I link to your term:http://micahredding.com/blog/minimum-viable-theology-we-are-not-alone …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micahtredding
regular ET aliens don't belong in that argument
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
They don't factor into the simulation hypothesis. I'm addressing the broader question of whether there's something bigger.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @micahtredding @vgr
Although ETs don't correlate with us, they say something about the Fermi Paradox / Great Filter.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @micahtredding
e.g. Star Wars midichlorians. You can imagine gods who are dumb ant-like beings on another plane whose actions create us here
2:53 PM - 6 Oct 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.