What's the pascal's wager formulation for the simulation hypothesis?
-
-
Replying to @vgr1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @micahtredding @vgr
My (considerably more touchy-feely) take on the subject, in which I link to your term:http://micahredding.com/blog/minimum-viable-theology-we-are-not-alone …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micahtredding
regular ET aliens don't belong in that argument
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
They don't factor into the simulation hypothesis. I'm addressing the broader question of whether there's something bigger.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @micahtredding @vgr
Although ETs don't correlate with us, they say something about the Fermi Paradox / Great Filter.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micahtredding @vgr
I see the Simulation Hypothesis as a subset of Great Filter anxiety. ;)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
aliens fit fine in an atheistic world view. Even vastly superior ones. There's good reason to believe they might exist
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.