What's the pascal's wager formulation for the simulation hypothesis?
-
-
Replying to @vgr1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @micahtredding @vgr
My (considerably more touchy-feely) take on the subject, in which I link to your term:http://micahredding.com/blog/minimum-viable-theology-we-are-not-alone …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micahtredding
regular ET aliens don't belong in that argument
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
They don't factor into the simulation hypothesis. I'm addressing the broader question of whether there's something bigger.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @micahtredding
I think in 'bigger' you're confounding more advanced species with categorically different beings like creators
2:48 PM - 6 Oct 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.