fair enough . But as you say, even if something does not follow the scientific method it still can be very useful e.g. philosophy.
Conversation
Replying to
I understand the problems that claims of science can provide but remember also, that's not necessarily the fault of the author.
2
Replying to
"not necessarily the fault of the author"? - TBH, in that specific case I'd have my doubts... (but yeah, I'm biased... :-( )
1
Replying to
ah ... well I don't know the history but purely on my own selfish grounds can I suggest you let the bias go ...
2
Replying to
"Let the bias go": true - let's just leave it at that. And thanks for taking me seriously in this - is much appreciated! :-)
1
Replying to
Challenge is always good . My own nemesis is and I'm truly grateful to him for how he has pushed and prodded.
1
Replying to
I've learned a lot from . I enjoy the push as it forced me to question the limits, constraints & validity ...
1
Replying to
... but there is a point where challenge can become personified. So I respect your view, I hope you let any bias slide.
2
Replying to
1
I think it's from a collection and obviously a response to paper by some less famous dude named Sutton in same issue

