great, risk triggering WW III because a few privileged westerners had their industry disrupted. Good luck with that.
-
-
Replying to @vgr @graaaaaagh
wwiii is an uncharacteristically alarmist concern, man. nobody wants war at that scale. modern conflict is something diff
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
tech, drones, cybersec... wars are fought on other fronts. no adversary is bordered. we fight enemies like isis: formless.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
if you're proposing wwiii as a serious risk then you also shoulder the burden of proof
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
not really. If it's a plausible scenario that becomes slightly more likely with immature clowns with nuke triggers...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr @graaaaaagh
"if" it's a plausible scenario, which has yet to be established. isis can be dealt with using drone strikes and black ops.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
and if nukes is your worry, then history shows a threat must be at least axis sized before anyone will go nuclear.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
failing either of those, wwiii is a concern troll at best.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
nope, not for me. I've been saying 0.1% probability all along. It's the extreme disutility that makes it a concern.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.