rebooted from relatively new approach post Hubble. Current NASA has origins in early 90s missions
-
-
-
space programs are more trial and error evolution than it might seem...program rather than mission level
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
thanks
@logicarbitrage and@mathieuhelie@pmarca@BenedictEvans bonus: this is institutional collapse form I was hunting rather than productThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NASA = German Peenemunde V2+Goddard era+Mercury+almost 'perfection' in Apollo era then shuttle failure
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
point being while that's going on, the 'thing' looks like an unfinished WIP rather than perfection
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
we're talking perfection as in system-context fit -->100% with marginal improvement rate-->0%. NASA has had chapters like that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this why my desk is such a mess?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is amazing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JuanLage@vgr@pmarca@BenedictEvans “Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien." (And I'm not a douchebag, it just doesn't make sense in English.)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.