I assume that second-order implications are off-limits. ;)
-
-
-
that's just condescension, go 3-4 steps ahead, then when they get it, and signal they do, they'll feel smart AND think you're smart
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or shows a lack of awareness of what constitutes "straightforward" to other people. There are intelligent people w/ different expertise
-
which is a kind of stupidity unless you miss some special condition and try explaining a medical fact to a doctor for eg
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Tip: don't point out implications of others' assertions unless a) it's based on info they're unlikely to have OR b) they're obvious learners
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no, subtweeting re a type of interaction I observed several times involving specific person who does this often (not to me)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yeah, like say 1 economist pointing out obvious implication of law of supply and demand to another economist
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is NYT insulting Trump's INT when pointing out Trump suggested in interview that Ghazala Khan wasn't "allowed to have anything to say"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
old man exception
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you mean explaining a joke is a bad idea?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.