...spent way too many years confused about this because I'm better at spotting patterns than being excited about their existence...
-
-
-
...patterns kinda depress and de-energize me. Non sequitur novelties buoy and energize me.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I know. My inner hedgehog will grow and kill me one day
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the problem with too much splitting is that it ultimately runs into Bradley's Regress-like situations, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lumping is not really the same as synthesizing, in fact it is defined as 'failed synthesis attempt' by Howard Gardner
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
all lumpy things are frankensteins. If it isn't a frankenstein it's a new new thing via destruction-creation of old things
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Splitters don't assume. Splitters have sufficient data. Lumpers don't. Split=Positive Hypothesis. Lump=Null Hypothesis.
#sciencemethod -
clearly you haven't met many wild speculator splitters like me
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.