Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jul 25, 2016Good stuff. Wish the argument were recast in intrinsic form that avoids the schema of levels/types and metaness thoQuote TweetDavid Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016‽ “A first lesson in meta-rationality”: in a STEM curriculum for cognitive 4→5 transition. http://meaningness.com/metablog/bongard-meta-rationality…2210
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @vgrThank you! I’m not sure what you mean by “intrinsic,” or what that would be in this case?3
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @Meaningnessdifferential geometry metaphor of the sort I used here. http://ribbonfarm.com/2011/08/19/the-calculus-of-grit/…52
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @vgrNot yet ready to comment re Kegan, but reading your post, the 3Rs are highly relevant to my own public work of past few years…11
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @Meaningness and @vgrI am *finally* just barely getting to the point where some of the key ideas are out, and I can keep referencing them11
Venkatesh Rao@vgrReplying to @Meaningnesshmm, where have I heard that before... I know a guy who's said that to me before 🤔5:05 PM · Jul 25, 2016