Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jul 25, 2016Good stuff. Wish the argument were recast in intrinsic form that avoids the schema of levels/types and metaness thoQuote TweetDavid Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016‽ “A first lesson in meta-rationality”: in a STEM curriculum for cognitive 4→5 transition. http://meaningness.com/metablog/bongard-meta-rationality…2210
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @vgrThank you! I’m not sure what you mean by “intrinsic,” or what that would be in this case?3
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @Meaningnessyeah frenet-serret equations are totally crack for the mathematically vulnerable mind :D1
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @vgraargh, I can see this is going to take a couple hours out of my afternoon1
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @Meaningness and @vgrgeneral idea is obvious from freshman mechanics, but I haven’t seen it done in this generality1
Venkatesh Rao@vgrReplying to @MeaningnessI dropped out of the grad course when I found I hated dealing with all those Einstein notation indices :D5:02 PM · Jul 25, 2016