Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jul 25, 2016Good stuff. Wish the argument were recast in intrinsic form that avoids the schema of levels/types and metaness thoQuote TweetDavid Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016‽ “A first lesson in meta-rationality”: in a STEM curriculum for cognitive 4→5 transition. http://meaningness.com/metablog/bongard-meta-rationality…2210
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @vgrThank you! I’m not sure what you mean by “intrinsic,” or what that would be in this case?3
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @Meaningnessdifferential geometry metaphor of the sort I used here. http://ribbonfarm.com/2011/08/19/the-calculus-of-grit/…52
Venkatesh Rao@vgrReplying to @Meaningnessthe post itself is probably irrelevant to this discussion. Key q is what are equivalent of arc-length, curvature torsion etc.4:46 PM · Jul 25, 2016
David Chapman@Meaningness·Jul 25, 2016Replying to @vgrbrb, have gotten sucked into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frenet%E2%80%93Serret_formulas…1