my point is, some drives will result in behaviors that are not hustle... hustle covers about 25% of motivated behavior space i'd guess
Conversation
Replying to
I think you may have lost me. My initial point was that "proof imperative" is often (always?) invisible to ourselves
1
Replying to
I'm saying it isn't invisible; it actually doesn't exist as a major drive for many. It's a personality trait, not universal human drive
2
I think you have largely convinced me when stated like that.
1
rethinking a bit, I think the proof drive is universal actually - yet its priority & influence on behavior varies amongst individuals.
1
Replying to
The proof imperative is as much internal as it is external -- but your point is taken in that some ppl it doesn't make a mark
2
Replying to
It is related to the competitive "win" drive rooted in wanting to be alpha. For some the countervailing "exit" drive is far stronger
2
1
Replying to
you're describing the Thielian split between Athletes and Nerds. Are you saying Nerds tend not to experience proof imperative?
1
Replying to
jeez you like lumping things together... you're a lumper, I'm a splitter, that's one reason we argue so much :D
I say (A, B), you say (A=X, B=Y) and reframe debate in (X, Y) assuming diff is insignificant. To me, lose diff = the whole point is gone
1
Show replies
Replying to
lumper means gloss over minor details that don't matter, right? ;P
1

