Keep telling yourself that buddy! :)
-
-
'proof imperative' is rarely conscious/rational. We can only feel its outlines in retrospect (even though others sense it in us).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Pv
Nope, you're projecting. Just spent weeks researching this. There are two distinct drives here with different behavioral heat signatures
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Pv
Twitter version: 'prove something' drive is what you guys cover in Hustle. Other drive (obviously 'Hack') has different energy source
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Pv
litmus test, if behaviors tend more towards exploration, poke-with-stick, it's hack. If towards exploitation, doubling down, it's hustle
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Pv
There isn't one in most curiosity driven behaviors. That's why most of it is private and has no consequence outside of satisfying itself
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr
FWIW wrt Hustle -- I am impartial as to source of motivation -- see https://www.dropbox.com/s/mzf2k19x1p6gfrk/Screenshot%202016-07-18%2010.45.53.png?dl=0 …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
my point is, some drives will result in behaviors that are not hustle... hustle covers about 25% of motivated behavior space i'd guess
-
-
Replying to @vgr
I think you may have lost me. My initial point was that "proof imperative" is often (always?) invisible to ourselves
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Pv
I'm saying it isn't invisible; it actually doesn't exist as a major drive for many. It's a personality trait, not universal human drive
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.