But how likely are there to be third parties both sides in controversy trust, especially if choose against them?https://twitter.com/vgr/status/751472009314312192 …
-
-
Replying to @suzywanalyst
@davidmanheim@ESYudkowsky they don't have to be trusted! They just have to break tacit agreement to avoid certain questions1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Okay, I like that. Is this developed further in any publication? Wd be useful to my thesis. Thanks!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
talk to @sarahdoingthing ... I'm speculatively extrapolating her idea to adversarial settings
11:39 AM - 8 Jul 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.