…being expected to read Lacan before debating postmodernists… versatile!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The burden is on Singularitarians (as it is on Biblical literalists) to make enough of a prima facie case for skeptics to even read the book
-
Reading a big fat book is a serious investment, like taking a case to trial. You have to make the indictment stick first.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
oh god that article is grade-A bullshit along a whole *other* vector. No shortage of flawed thinking in this area.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
I read it. Well, most of it. Isn't an argument counter to the singularitarians pov? Like, be careful here.Maybe I'm missing something.
-
I have enough real shit to worry about being careful about to not want to add imaginary worries...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also, s* is super hard to spell.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can verify this from personal experience.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a hard problem for anything with long inferential depth. Allegory like the dragon-tyrant piece doesn't cut it either.
-
what dragon tiger piece?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.