Venkatesh Rao@vgrPoll: Your view on the possibility of superintelligence (see: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence…)It is nearly inevitable58.8%It is highly improbable7.4%The idea is ill-posed30.4%Other (@ reply specifics)3.4%148 votes·Final results2:31 PM · Jun 17, 20161 Quote Tweet2 Likes
Durchlass Kilometer 5,698@emareaf·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @vgrI don't have a coherent opinion about it.11
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @emareafdon't tell anyone, but that makes you superintelligent1
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @IsaacWyattAny type, and I don't think one already exists going by the narrow definition in which the SI-ers seem to operate by
Anthony Di Franco@dfko_0·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @vgrisn't, like, the internet, like, a global super intelligent brain already, man? Far out man I know. Think about it man. Think about it.11
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @dfko_0You and I think that's a reductio ad absurdum response, but I don't think the SI-ers think it qualifies11
Víctor Marín@Erthelillo·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @vgrI don't get why would humans create an inteligence capable of enhancing itself, without using it to enhance themselves1
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @Erthelillothat's an easy question... the enhancement interface for humans is strongly limited.
Venkatesh Rao@vgr·Jun 18, 2016Replying to @vgrN=148. 59% of my local Twitter thinks superintelligence is inevitable. My choice ("it's ill-posed") is #2 with 30%Quote TweetVenkatesh Rao@vgr·Jun 17, 2016Poll: Your view on the possibility of superintelligence (see: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence…)Show this poll113
Glen Cochrane@GlenFCochrane·Jun 17, 2016Replying to @vgrinevitable, but also Superspecialized (to a point that it tests our definition of intelligent)2